birds eye view

Follow ontheten on Twitter

Thursday, August 23, 2007

join the resistance



so the question is, can we as a community, or a queer nation, as it were, begin to have conversations around what we believe to be healthy? is it okay for some of us to hate watching our brothers spin out on tweak and not say anything? and is it okay to say something if we hate it? can we allow ourselves the space to have our concerns and express them? and can we allow you to have your space while we really don't like what you do? i don't know the answers to this. in a perfect world, i would think yes. but what is our true nature? i wonder if we know more than we give ourselves credit for and we can do more, much more, than we conceive.

in boston and in san francisco, the newest campaign to reduce the meth damage is to enlist ourselves to educate and promote thoughtful decision making. will this take us to a place of more understanding? or will it become more divisive?

from bay windows of boston:

Last month Fenway Community Health's New Champions, a federally funded program working to combat crystal meth addiction, launched its second major phase, debuting its Resist Meth ad campaign and holding its second training for men to learn how to do outreach in the community and talk about meth use and addiction. New Champions, a collaboration between Fenway, AIDS Action Committee, and the Latin American Health Institute, is one of 10 programs around the country receiving crystal meth prevention money from a grant through the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSA), but among those programs it is the only one focused on confronting meth addiction within the gay male community.
Jed Barnum, program manager for New Champions, said the other programs receiving the SAMSA meth grant focus on other populations such as children, youth in the juvenile justice system and Native Americans. The program managers share information through conference calls and meet at conferences held twice each year, and Barnum said the New Champions program has been able to provide those other programs with a new perspective because of the unique patterns of meth addiction in the gay male community. He said representing a gay-focused program has allowed him to advocate for a focus on the links between sex and meth use in the programs' approach to tracking meth use.

"It's allowed us to advocate for questions around sexual behavior that might be tricky to do in other cases," said Barnum.

for the rest of the article click here.




and it seems as if san francisco is following suit:



I don't touch meth but know where to get it. It seems that Castro Street
in San Francisco is awash in the crystalline powder, with every twink in
town all tweaked out on it and engaging in wild sex orgies and spreading
HIV. So the self-proclaimed LBGTFHZ leadership has decreed that this is
a community crisis and has begun a propaganda campaign to re-educate the
twinked-out masses to resist crystal meth.

There were "Resist Meth" posters everywhere, with an image reminiscent of
a 1950s-era Soviet propaganda poster depicting a worker promoting the
the socialist revolution, and the inspiring slogan "resist meth" that is
sure to re-educate the proles. There was another propaganda poster
depicting some sort of crystal meth board game, and a headline in the gay
Bay Area Reporter rag that declared that crystal meth use has "plateued"
and that the re-education campaign should start to reduce use soon.


BTW, on the train home yesterday there was someone who appeared to be on
crystal meth, though not obviously gay. He just kept walking back and
forth through the cars with a dazed look on his face and he didn't look
like a disheveled homeless person (yet), so I assumed he was on meth.

3 comments:

FireHorse said...

What the hell is a LBGTFHZ. No wonder I don't feel a part of a community anymore. I am being absorbed into letters. The fringe dwellers.

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure we're asking ourselves hard enough: What would we--ex-users--have responded to when we were out there? Would any argument have convinced us t attempt sobriety? What kind of reach out--if any--might we have responded to?
Unfortunately, my "intervention" was arrest and prison. But what I think might have helped is if I heard testimonials about how much better life was sober than I thought it was. That my ability to laugh, to have sex, just to feel at ease in my skin would return. I didn't realize how I felt off the stuff for 4 or 5 days had nothing to do with how I'd feel off the stuff for months, and with the support of a program.
I vote for Dewars Profile-like billboards, except of sober men, who look good, list their accomplishments, and talk about where they've been and where they are now. With real names. I'm thinking this MIGHT have moved me.

Unknown said...

d- there is very much fringe, but i don't think you are one of them. i haven't seen you in person to really know for sure, but since you can put together sentences that have meaning, i am assuming. i also have a feeling you're handsome. anyway, i think the acronym is actually not real. except one of those that someone makes up in their heads. the article was to demonstrate the saturation of the media image and the blitz campaign that is being impelemented.

marc-
i am not sure, but if i had thought i would get dates if i didn't use, i might have been inclined. i do think peer messaging has great value. after all, i listen quite closely to my online home group.

Related Posts with Thumbnails